Logic chases truth up the tree of grammar.
Necessity resides in the way we talk about things, not in the things we talk about.
The totality of our so-called knowledge or beliefs, from the most casual matters of geography and history to the profoundest laws of atomic physics or even of pure mathematics and logic, is a man-made fabric which impinges on experience only along the edges. Or, to change the figure, total science is like a field of force whose boundary conditions are experience.
Science is not a substitute for common sense, but an extension of it.
We must not leap to the fatalistic conclusion that we are stuck with the conceptual scheme that we grew up in. We can change it, bit by bit, plank by plank, though meanwhile there is nothing to carry us along but the evolving conceptual scheme itself. The philosopher's task was well compared by Neurath to that of a mariner who must rebuild his ship on the open sea.
To define an expression is, paradoxically speaking, to explain how to get along without it. To define is to eliminate.
Yields falsehood when preceded by its quotation.
Life is what the least of us make the most of us feel the least of us make the most of.
To be is to be the value of a variable.
One man's observation is another man's closed book or flight of fancy.
My position is a naturalistic one; I see philosophy not as an a priori propaedeutic or groundwork for science, but as continuous with science. I see philosophy and science as in the same boat--a boat which, to revert to Neurath's figure as I so often do, we can rebuild only at sea while staying afloat in it. There is no external vantage point, no first philosophy.
Irrefragability, thy name is mathematics.
The word 'definition' has come to have a dangerously reassuring sound, owing no doubt to its frequent occurrence in logical and mathematical writings.
Meaning is what essence becomes when it is divorced from the object of reference and wedded to the word.
Wyman's overpopulated universe is in many ways unlovely. It offends the aesthetic sense of us who have a taste for desert landscapes.
I have been accused of denying consciousness but I am not conscious of having done so.
Language is a social art.
Nonbeing must in some sense be, otherwise what is it that there is not? This tangled doctrine might be nicknamed Plato's beard; historically it has proved tough, frequently dulling the edge of Occam's razor.
Creatures inveterately wrong in their inductions have a pathetic but praise-worthy tendency to die before reproducing their kind.
Implication is thus the very texture of our web of belief, and logic is the theory that traces it.
We do not learn first what to talk about and then what to say about it.
One man's antinomy is another man's falsidical paradox, give or take a couple of thousand years.
It is within science itself, and not in some prior philosophy, that reality is to be identified and described.
Our talk of external things, our very notion of things, is just a conceptual apparatus that helps us to foresee and control the triggerings of our sensory receptors in the light of previous triggering of our sensory receptors.
A curious thing about the ontological problem is its simplicity. It can be put into three Anglo-Saxon monosyllables: 'What is there?' It can be answered, moreover, in a word--'Everything'--and everyone will accept this answer as true.
Follow AzQuotes on Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Every day we present the best quotes! Improve yourself, find your inspiration, share with friends
or simply: