Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway.
If anyone had realized that within 10 years this tiny system that was picked up almost by accident was going to be controlling 50 million computers, considerably more thought might have gone into it.
The only way to make software secure, reliable, and fast is to make it small.
XML combines the efficiency of text files with the readability of binary files
I have a mouse, but don't have a mouse driver for MINIX and have never felt the need to write one. Typing "rm x y z" is a lot faster than clicking five times and then having to convince the system that you really, truly, mean it and this is not a mistake and that you are consenting adult over 18 and that you completely understand the consequences and you still want to do it.
I can type faster than I can point. And my mother told me that pointing is impolite.
Unfortunately, the current generation of mail programs do not have checkers to see if the sender knows what he is talking about.
Sequential programming is really hard, and parallel programming is a step beyond that.
However, as every parent of a small child knows, converting a large object into small fragments is considerably easier than the reverse process.
A refund for defective software might be nice, except it would bankrupt the entire software industry in the first year.
'Linux is a leprosy' - This statement is not grammatically or factually correct.
A multithreaded file system is only a performance hack.
With current technology it is possible to put four floppy disk drives in a personal computer. It is just that doing so would be pointless.
UNIX does not allow path names to be prefixed by a drive name or number; that would be precisely the kind of device dependence that operating systems ought to eliminate.
The only real argument for monolithic systems was performance, and there is now enough evidence showing that microkernel systems can be just as fast as monolithic systems.
A couple of years ago this guy called Ken Brown wrote a book saying that Linus stole Linux from me It later came out that Microsoft had paid him to do this
Writing a portable OS is not much harder than a nonportable one, and all systems should be written with portability in mind these days.
But in all honesty, I would suggest that people who want a modern "free" OS look around for a microkernel-based, portable OS, like maybe GNU or something like that.
I had never engaged in remote multishrink psychoanalysis on this scale before, so it was a fascinating experience.
While most people can talk rationally about kernel design and portability, the issue of free-ness is 100% emotional.
A lot of other people wanted a free production UNIX with lots of bells and whistles and wanted to convert MINIX into that. I was dragged along in the maelstrom for a while, but when Linux came along, I was actually relieved that I could go back to professoring.
I really am not angry with Linus. Honest. He's not angry with me either.
Microkernels are not a pipe dream. They represent proven technology.
Follow AzQuotes on Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Every day we present the best quotes! Improve yourself, find your inspiration, share with friends
or simply: