Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
Economics is extremely useful as a form of employment for economists.
Mr. David Stockman has said that supply-side economics was merely a cover for the trickle-down approach to economic policy — what an older and less elegant generation called the horse-and-sparrow theory: If you feed the horse enough oats, some will pass through to the road for the sparrows.
In economics, the majority is always wrong.
The conventional view serves to protect us from the painful job of thinking.
If you feed enough oats to the horse, some will pass through to feed the sparrows (referring to "trickle down" economics).
The study of money, above all other fields in economics, is one in which complexity is used to disguise truth or to evade truth, not to reveal it. The process by which banks create money is so simple the mind is repelled.
It is a well known and very important fact that America's founding fathers did not like taxation without representation. It is a lesser known and equally important fact that they did not much like taxation with representation.
In economics, hope and faith coexist with great scientific pretension and also a deep desire for respectability.
The problem of the modern economy is not a failure of a knowledge of economics; it's a failure of a knowledge of history.
One of the greatest pieces of economic wisdom is to know what you do not know.
Meetings are indispensable when you don't want to do anything.
Few can believe that suffering, especially by others, is in vain. Anything that is disagreeable must surely have beneficial economic effects.
I've been a faithful reader of the great classical documents of economics, or tried to be. The first book in the field that I ever read was Principles of Economics by Alfred Marshall. I suppose subsequently I would have to pick out Keynes, Adam Smith, Marx.
Agriculture is one economic activity that does not obey the laws of demand and supply.
Men will look back in amusement at the pretence that once caused people to refer to General Dynamics and North American Aviation and AT&T as private business.
There is an old saying, or should be, that it is a wise economist who recognizes the scope of his own generalizations.
Happiness does not require an expanding economy
The shortcomings of economics are not original error but uncorrected obsolescence. The obsolescence has occurred because what is convenient has become sacrosanct. Anyone who attacks such ideas must seem to be a trifle self-confident and even aggressive. The man who makes his entry by leaning against an infirm door gets an unjustified reputation for violence. Something is to be attributed to the poor state of the door.
Good writing, and this is especially important in a subject such as economics, must also involve the reader in the matter at hand. It is not enough to explain. The images that are in the mind of the writer must be made to reappear in the mind of the reader, and it is the absence of this ability that causes much economic writing to be condemned, quite properly, as abstract.
Economics exists to make astrology look respectable.
Liberalism is, I think, resurgent. One reason is that more and more people are so painfully aware of the alternative.
In economics, unlike fiction and the theater, there is no harm in a premature disclosure of the plot: it is to see the changes just mentioned and others as an interlocked whole.
In economics it is a far, far wiser thing to be right than to be consistent
I've been writing a book called The Economics of Innocent Fraud. I published part of it already in The Progressive ("Free Market Fraud," January 1999). But I've been interrupted these last few months. It deals with all of the things we do, in an innocent way, to cover up the truth.
Follow AzQuotes on Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Every day we present the best quotes! Improve yourself, find your inspiration, share with friends
or simply: