In real open source, you have the right to control your own destiny.
The power of Open Source is the power of the people. The people rule.
Open source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement.
Empowerment of individuals is a key part of what makes open source work, since in the end, innovations tend to come from small groups, not from large, structured efforts.
Open source isn't about saving money, it's about doing more stuff, and getting incremental innovation with the finite budget you have.
Once open source gets good enough, competing with it would be insane.
In open source, we feel strongly that to really do something well, you have to get a lot of people involved.
Technology innovation is starting to explode and having open-source material out there really helps this explosion. You get students and researchers involved and you get people coming through and building start ups based on open source products.
I think, fundamentally, open source does tend to be more stable software. It's the right way to do things.
There are many examples of companies and countries that have improved their competitiveness and efficiency by adopting open source strategies. The creation of skills through all levels is of fundamental importance to both companies and countries.
Certainly there's a phenomenon around open source. You know free software will be a vibrant area. There will be a lot of neat things that get done there.
If you seek to help, join the open source community and fight to keep the spirit of the press alive and the internet free. I have been to the darkest corners of government, and what they fear is light.
I often compare open source to science. To where science took this whole notion of developing ideas in the open and improving on other peoples' ideas and making it into what science is today and the incredible advances that we have had. And I compare that to witchcraft and alchemy, where openness was something you didn't do.
Open source is an intellectual-property destroyer, I can't imagine something that could be worse than this for the software business and the intellectual-property business.
A lot of people who work on open-source software don't mind making money elsewhere. They aren't anticommercial.
Let me be clear - Microsoft has no beef with open source.
I think a lot of the basis of the open source movement comes from procrastinating students.
Today I am one of the senior technical cadre that makes the Internet work, and a core Linux and open-source developer.
If an open source product gets good enough, we'll simply take it. So the great thing about open source is nobody owns it - a company like Oracle is free to take it for nothing, include it in our products and charge for support, and that's what we'll do. So it is not disruptive at all - you have to find places to add value. Once open source gets good enough, competing with it would be insane. We don't have to fight open source, we have to exploit open source.
Open-source code is extremely well-adapted to service-oriented architecture.
My own personal dream is that the majority of the web runs on open source software.
Free open-source software, by its nature, is unlikely to feature secret back doors that lead directly to Langley, Va.
You can't take a dying project, sprinkle it with the magic pixie dust of "open source," and have everything magically work out.
Open source is important to our orgs as a talent pool; we need better representation of women.
I would love to see all open-source innovation happen on top of Windows.
Follow AzQuotes on Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Every day we present the best quotes! Improve yourself, find your inspiration, share with friends
or simply: