The foundation of individual rights is the assumption that people have wants and needs and are authorities on what those wants and needs are. If people's stated desires were just some kind of erasable inscription or reprogrammable brainwashing, any atrocity could be justified.
My opinions about human nature are shared by many psychologists, linguists, and biologists, not to mention philosophers and scholars going back centuries.
Natural selection is not the only process that changes organisms over time. But is the only process that seemingly designs organisms over time.
Unfortunately, creative people are at their most creative when writing their autobiographies.
The typical imperative from biology is not "Thou shalt... ," but "If ... then ... else.
When a scientist considers all high-tech mental machinery needed to arrange words into ordinary sentences, prescriptive rules are, at best, inconsequential little decorations. The very fact that they have to be drilled shows that they are alien to the natural workings of the language system. One can choose to obsess over prescriptive rules, but they have no more to do with language than the criteria for judging cats at a cat show have to do with mammalian biology.
By exploring the political and moral colorings of discoveries about what makes us tick, we can have a more honest science and a less fearful intellectual milieu.
I think a lot of moral debates are not over what is the basis of justice, but who gets a ticket to play in the game.
I think that a failure of statistical thinking is the major intellectual shortcoming of our universities, journalism and intellectual culture.
In societies no less than individuals, acknowledging our limitations may ultimately be more humane than denying them.
As many political writers have pointed out, commitment to political equality is not an empirical claim that people are clones.
But in most cases even the possibility that the correlations reflect shared genes is taboo.
Equity feminism is a moral doctrine about equal treatment that makes no commitments regarding open empirical issues in psychology or biology.
Heritability pertains to the entirety of the genome, not to a single gene.
I don't consider myself to be that radical a thinker.
I get drawn in when I feel there is something deep and mysterious going on beneath the surface of something.
I like ice hockey. No one is ever going to ask me to write about that as a metaphor for life.
I teach classes 28 weeks of the year, but the rest of the time I do research and write books.
Language mavens commonly confuse their own peeves with a worsening of the language.
Like the early days of the Internet, the dawn of personal genomics promises benefits and pitfalls that no one can foresee.
One of the perks of being a psychologist is access to tools that allow you to carry out the injunction to know thyself.
Paris Hilton, it turns out, is related to fellow celebrity jailbirds Zsa Zsa Gabor and G. Gordon Liddy.
People are under the impression that dictionaries legislate language. What a dictionary does is keep track of usages over time.
The 9/11 strikes left an indelible impact on our minds, but in relative terms, the scale of casualties actually wasn't all that high.
The brain is not a bag of traits. It's startlingly complex. There are few or no single genes with a consistent effect on the mind.
Follow AzQuotes on Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Every day we present the best quotes! Improve yourself, find your inspiration, share with friends
or simply: