Many people make the mistake of confusing information with knowledge. They are not the same thing. Knowledge involves the interpretation of information. Knowledge involves listening.
Look to the essence of a thing, whether it be a point of doctrine, of practice, or of interpretation.
There are no facts, only interpretations.
All meanings, we know, depend on the key of interpretation.
The arts celebrate multiple perspectives. One of their large lessons is that there are many ways to see and interpret the world.
Everyone in a complex system has a slightly different interpretation. The more interpretations we gather, the easier it becomes to gain a sense of the whole.
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
Interpretation is the revenge of the intellect upon art. Even more. It is the revenge of the intellect upon the world. To interpret is to impoverish, to deplete the world -- in order to set up a shadow world of ''meanings.''
Necessity is not an established fact, but an interpretation.
Less information often leads to more interpretation.
In doubtful cases the more liberal interpretation must always be preferred.
Through interpretation, understanding; through understanding, appreciation; through appreciation, protection.
We see and hear and otherwise experience very largely as we do because the language habits of our community predispose certain choices of interpretation.
The human race is facing all kinds of problems, and all we are doing is pointing fingers and saying, 'Your interpretation of the problem is different from my interpretations of the problem.
We see, not change of aspect, but change of interpretation.
All interpretations made by a scientist are hypotheses, and all hypotheses are tentative. They must forever be tested and they must be revised if found to be unsatisfactory. Hence, a change of mind in a scientist, and particularly in a great scientist, is not only not a sign of weakness but rather evidence for continuing attention to the respective problem and an ability to test the hypothesis again and again.
The mathematical framework of quantum theory has passed countless successful tests and is now universally accepted as a consistent and accurate description of all atomic phenomena. The verbal interpretation, on the other hand - i.e., the metaphysics of quantum theory - is on far less solid ground. In fact, in more than forty years physicists have not been able to provide a clear metaphysical model.
In most modern instances, interpretation amounts to the philistine refusal to leave the work of art alone. Real art has the capacity to make us nervous. By reducing the work of art to its content and then interpreting that, one tames the work of art. Interpretation makes art manageable, conformable.
Museums are managers of consciousness. They give us an interpretation of history, of how to view the world and locate ourselves in it. They are, if you want to put it in positive terms, great educational institutions. If you want to put it in negative terms, they are propaganda machines.
What is a moderate interpretation of the text? Halfway between what it really means and what you'd like it to mean?
Is your work an interpretation of your understanding of reality, or is it simply a picture of your feelings?
The art of interpretation is not to play what is written.
The interpretation of our reality through patterns not our own, serves only to make us ever more unknown, ever less free, ever more solitary.
The person viewing your work has no idea what the scene really looked like, nor do they care.
Unlike any other visual image, a photograph is not a rendering, an imitation or an interpretation of its subject, but actually a trace of it. No painting or drawing, however naturalist, belongs to its subject in the way that a photograph does.
Follow AzQuotes on Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Every day we present the best quotes! Improve yourself, find your inspiration, share with friends
or simply: