In the early days of the software industry, people cared about copyright and didn't give a damn about patents - they copied each other willy-nilly.
Software touches all of these different things you use, and tech companies are revolutionizing all different areas of the world...from how we shop to how farming works, all these things that aren't technical are being turned upside down by software. So being able to play in that universe really makes a difference.
I developed some unique software to public it on the web that I call the Folklore Project.
One of the problems with computers, particularly for the older people, is they were befuddled by them, and the computers have gotten better. They have gotten easier to use. They have gotten less expensive. The software interfaces have made things a lot more accessible
Never in the annals of software engineering was so much owed by so many to so few lines of code
I really think it is amazing that people actually buy software.
My own personal dream is that the majority of the web runs on open source software.
I believe that software, and in fact entire companies, should be run in a way that assumes that the sum of the talent of people outside your walls is greater than the sum of the few you have inside. None of us are as smart as all of us.
Elegance? It may seem odd to non-scientists, but there is an aesthetic in software as there is in every other area of intellectual endeavour. Truly great programmers are like great poets or great mathematicians - they can achieve in a few lines what lesser mortals can only approach in three volumes
What kind of programmer is so divorced from reality that she thinks she'll get complex software right the first time?
There is no neat distinction between operating system software and the software that runs on top of it.
Open source is an intellectual-property destroyer, I can't imagine something that could be worse than this for the software business and the intellectual-property business.
Like many older fans of Free Software and Open Source, I have discovered that it is really only free in the sense that the time you spend on it is worthless.
I was trying to figure out what to do next, I'd been accumulating ideas for productivity tools - software people could use every day, particularly to help organize their lives.
This will surprise some of your readers, but my primary interest is not with computer security. I am primarily interested in writing software that works as intended.
In a previous life I wrote the software that controlled my physics experiments. That software had to deal with all kinds of possible failures in equipment. That is probably where I learned to rely on multiple safety nets inside and around my systems.
I want to avoid locking people into solutions that work only with Postfix. People should have a choice in what software they want to use with Postfix, be it anti-virus or otherwise.
Like all software, Qmail can survive only when it keeps up with changing requirements.
The Postfix security model is based on keeping software simple and stupid.
The challenge with Postfix, or with any piece of software, is to update software without introducing problems.
Writing software that's safe even in the presence of bugs makes the challenge even more interesting.
It's time to re-appreciate the original software: paper.
Our biological body itself is a form of hardware that needs re-programming through tantra like a new spiritual software which can release or unblock its potential.
Sharing the code just seems like The Right Thing to Do. It costs us rather little, but it benefits a lot of people in sometimes very significant ways. There are many university research projects, proof of concept publisher demos, and new platform test beds that have leveraged the code. Free software that people value adds wealth to the world.
All programming is maintenance programming, because you are rarely writing original code.
Follow AzQuotes on Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Every day we present the best quotes! Improve yourself, find your inspiration, share with friends
or simply: